[Dana Banona, Privacy Law Contributor]
MailOnline: Last week, in what will turn out to be a test case for the enforceability of UK superinjunctions when they have been deliberately breached on social networking sites such as Twitter, an England footballer who had obtained a superinjuction, has asked the court granting it to prosecute the writer who deliberately flounted it on Twitter. Mr. Justice Tugendhat, a UK privacy judge, has referred the case to the UK Attorney General for consideration of prosecution.
A UK privacy order, or superinjunction, is an order of a UK court and those who breach it commit a ‘contempt of court‘ which is punishable by imprisonment. As the privacy injunction appears to be been deliberately breached on Twitter, it is more than likely that the violator, a well-known writer, will face criminal prosecution quite shortly.
Related articles
- Footballer’s Twitter disclosure order prompts online action (bbc.co.uk)
- Superinjuctions and celebrity privacy case numbers revealed (blogs.journalism.co.uk)
- You: Superinjunctions: Modern technology is completely out of control, says lord chief justice (guardian.co.uk)
- Twitter and other social media sites legally bound to obey UK superinjunctions (dominicatimes.wordpress.com)
- UK superinjunction Judges declare war on Twitter and Internet bloggers (dominicatimes.wordpress.com)
- Twitter row prompts calls for superinjunctions debate in parliament (guardian.co.uk)
- Footballer sparks Twitter storm (bbc.co.uk)
- Nitwit hits Twitter with writ (thesun.co.uk)
- Footballer acts against Twitter (tjantunen.com)
- Thousands unite to name Imogen Thomas injunction footballer on Twitter (mirror.co.uk)
- “Suing Twitter” and related posts (ministryoftruth.me.uk)
- Twitter sued by footballer over privacy (guardian.co.uk)
- “Footballer seeks Twitter answers” and related posts (rocketnews.com)
- Footballer sparks Twitter storm (tjantunen.com)
Leave a comment